The British judge Colin Birss Apple has decreed that the UK should know that Samsung has not copied the design of the iPad. Apple claims that Samsung’s Galaxy Tab is a slavish copy of the iPad.
Apple needs in the UK for six months on his own website refer to the judgment of July 9 in which was ruled Samsung’s favor. Apple demanded a ban the sales of the Galaxy Tab, because that would be a slavish copy of the iPad, but the judge rejected the request, partly because the Galaxy Tab ‘is not as cool as the iPad. Apple should also place advertisements in the Financial Times, the Daily Mail, The Guardian and the T3 magazine Mobile, reports Bloomberg.
The note on the Apple Web site must remain visible six months, the court ordered continued. In order for potential customers to avoid the impression that this was a mere copy of the Galaxy Tab iPad. This from Apple in patent disputes over again to tablet designs put forward an objection to the Company believes will lead to confused customers that the devices. Apple does not only its sales but also the image of the brand at risk.
The Cupertino company might, however, continue to clain that it feels that the Galaxy Tab infringe the design patent of the iPad. Samsung wanted a ban on public statements concerning the infringement of Apple, but Apple was be entitled to an opinion, said the judge. Apple has already indicated to appeal against the July 9 ruling of July, therefore also the permission of the court. The far most important procedure for the patents of both companies on 30Opened in July 2012 in the United States. This process should be clarified in a main property method, which companies may have violated the patents of the other. Apple leads for four patents, Samsung seven.